Of course it depends which mushrooms you talk to… or consume… goats seem to enjoy reading Vonnegut and Ursula Le Guin… or so Psilocybins would have us believe! 🙂
And whatever you do, NEVER…for one second… receive financial advice from the Squid King… he once told me the beta between Mujirushi shares and the movement of the Nikkei Index was 1.8, when any idiot with a calculator and an IQ of at least 65 could figure out it was at least 2.8!
You might as well have asked a gibbon the same question, because at least the gibbon would have known, (considering the beta ratios mentioned), if it was a bear or bull market, and thus possibly better to have been doing some quick day trading, or holding onto a long term portfolio strategy…
Me neither… though I will make an exception for cuttlefish.
A particularly friendly one helped me understand how material implication is not actually consistent with how we define conditionals. i.e. “if Robert Okaji is a poet, then Osaka is a city in Japan”. The statement is true formally, but Osaka is a city in Japan regardless of Robert Okaji’s poetry. Causality is not required…
As the mushroom has declined to speak on the matter, might I provide an answer in its stead?
It seems human beings, in general, can barely tolerate the notion that photons can emerge from “Nothing” — that is, they literally, spontaneously pop into existence WITHOUT a specific or determinable cause — a phenomenon which excludes the necessity for a “causative” influence by any outside force (such as a god, for instance). For one thing, the fact that “Nothing” (defined, at least scientifically, as the absolute negation of existence of any kind), by its very definition, does not have an “outside,” becomes something of a sticking point, when it comes to contemplating the nature and meaning of the universe and such.
And yet, here you are, my friend, boldly eschewing anthropocentric, tautological doctrine, in order to imagine a “fungicentric” universe which may just as easily as not thrive on that very principle of indeterminacy incarnate, Light (as in, “Let there be…” — or not, as the case may be!).
While neither dismissing nor substantiating (your?) melancholia’s profundity (both potential and realized), the mushroom’s refusal to provide a determinable, observable response to a human salutation brilliantly casts the landscape we scout for topographical wonders in a whole, new light…
I seem to be withering back more and more, lately… Yesterday morning I accidentally committed fungicide – while walking, I kicked over a solitary red mushroom. It appeared that it had been chewed upon, and was a shade of red I’d not seen in this area. A lovely surprise! But I wish I hadn’t disturbed it.
If a mushroom spoke to me I’d have a heart attack, ‘tho I fully expect to see fairies and elves dancing in the moonlight. I have always tried to maintain a childlike wonder for the world around me.
Your poem brought to mind a favorite re mushrooms, Derek Mahon’s “A Disused Shed in Co. Wexford”: They have been waiting for us in a foetor / Of vegetable sweat since civil war days, /Since the gravel-crunching, interminable departure /Of the expropriated mycologist. /He never came back, and light since then /Is a keyhole rusting gently after rain. Mahon is very Latinate and wordy, where you are more of a minimalist, but the notion of a (possibly) animate mushroom is irresistible.
I like that you talk to the mushrooms… sounds like something Kenko would have wrote about in the Tsurezuregusa!
36 stars out of 5.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They’ve never answered, so far as I can tell, but I keep talking. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Of course it depends which mushrooms you talk to… or consume… goats seem to enjoy reading Vonnegut and Ursula Le Guin… or so Psilocybins would have us believe! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
How could they not?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The goats are right. “The Left Hand of Darkness” is a classic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are indeed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And whatever you do, NEVER…for one second… receive financial advice from the Squid King… he once told me the beta between Mujirushi shares and the movement of the Nikkei Index was 1.8, when any idiot with a calculator and an IQ of at least 65 could figure out it was at least 2.8!
You might as well have asked a gibbon the same question, because at least the gibbon would have known, (considering the beta ratios mentioned), if it was a bear or bull market, and thus possibly better to have been doing some quick day trading, or holding onto a long term portfolio strategy…
LikeLike
I never seek financial advice from cephalopods.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me neither… though I will make an exception for cuttlefish.
A particularly friendly one helped me understand how material implication is not actually consistent with how we define conditionals. i.e. “if Robert Okaji is a poet, then Osaka is a city in Japan”. The statement is true formally, but Osaka is a city in Japan regardless of Robert Okaji’s poetry. Causality is not required…
… or so the cuttlefish would have me believe!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, those clever cuttlefish!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a gem on so many levels.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you very much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow! Great photography and lovely poem.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Barbara. I very seldom take photos worth using, but that mushroom just popped out!
LikeLike
Beautiful imagery, concise and profound. Love this!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on O LADO ESCURO DA LUA.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, as always, for reblogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
2 M’s opens acuity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good to hear from you, b! A little more acuity is in order these days, don’t you think?
LikeLike
I like the quietness of this one. It drew me in.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Carolin. Those mushroom are quiet but forceful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, the quiet ones often run deep.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Does light incite you?”
As the mushroom has declined to speak on the matter, might I provide an answer in its stead?
It seems human beings, in general, can barely tolerate the notion that photons can emerge from “Nothing” — that is, they literally, spontaneously pop into existence WITHOUT a specific or determinable cause — a phenomenon which excludes the necessity for a “causative” influence by any outside force (such as a god, for instance). For one thing, the fact that “Nothing” (defined, at least scientifically, as the absolute negation of existence of any kind), by its very definition, does not have an “outside,” becomes something of a sticking point, when it comes to contemplating the nature and meaning of the universe and such.
And yet, here you are, my friend, boldly eschewing anthropocentric, tautological doctrine, in order to imagine a “fungicentric” universe which may just as easily as not thrive on that very principle of indeterminacy incarnate, Light (as in, “Let there be…” — or not, as the case may be!).
While neither dismissing nor substantiating (your?) melancholia’s profundity (both potential and realized), the mushroom’s refusal to provide a determinable, observable response to a human salutation brilliantly casts the landscape we scout for topographical wonders in a whole, new light…
In other words,
YES!
LikeLiked by 3 people
I seem to be withering back more and more, lately… Yesterday morning I accidentally committed fungicide – while walking, I kicked over a solitary red mushroom. It appeared that it had been chewed upon, and was a shade of red I’d not seen in this area. A lovely surprise! But I wish I hadn’t disturbed it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Simple, yet beautiful. I love it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you!
LikeLike
If a mushroom spoke to me I’d have a heart attack, ‘tho I fully expect to see fairies and elves dancing in the moonlight. I have always tried to maintain a childlike wonder for the world around me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m certain the mushroom would speak to me of impermanence…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would indeed 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Your poem brought to mind a favorite re mushrooms, Derek Mahon’s “A Disused Shed in Co. Wexford”: They have been waiting for us in a foetor / Of vegetable sweat since civil war days, /Since the gravel-crunching, interminable departure /Of the expropriated mycologist. /He never came back, and light since then /Is a keyhole rusting gently after rain. Mahon is very Latinate and wordy, where you are more of a minimalist, but the notion of a (possibly) animate mushroom is irresistible.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is indeed irresistible, if a tad scary. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too good 😊 I love this
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks very much, Anita!
LikeLike
Mushrooms. What an interesting source of vitamins lol. Kidding!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sauteed in butter!
LikeLike
I love this Robert. I’m glad I’m not alone in talking to “things”. I hope the mushrooms are not offended by being referred to as things!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Peter. I come from a long line of animists. Oh, I’m certain the mushrooms aren’t offended. You should hear how they refer to us!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I once spent a few days living in a mushroom factory farm (long story!). You should have heard them complain about our smell!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is peaceful, I love it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mushrooms are rather placid. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems we all love mushrooms.
LikeLike